The Impulses of Lunar Fed Policy Under Repo Madness

This week, while you were busy working, Jamie Dimon, CEO of JP Morgan Chase, took time out from rubbing elbows with fellow movers and shakers at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, to share his trepidations:

“The only thing I have trepidation about is negative interest rates, QE, and the diversion between stock prices and bond prices and yield and stuff like that….  I think it’s very hard for central banks to forever make up for bad policy elsewhere, that puts them in a trap.  We’re a little bit in that trap today with rates so low around the world.”

Fair enough.  Though Dimon, in what we presume was an inadvertent omission, failed to share that his firm may have recently walked the Federal Reserve into an elaborate policy trap.  Now the Fed’s stuck.  JP Morgan’s thrown away the keys.  And Dimon’s reaped a significant windfall.

If you recall, between Monday night and Tuesday morning September 16/17 the overnight repurchase agreement (repo) rate hit 10 percent.  Short-term liquidity markets essentially broke.  The Fed had to intervene in the repo market, via overnight repo operations, to push the repo rate back below 2 percent.

Since then, overnight repo operations by the Fed have become a near daily occurrence.  What’s more, these daily operations have ballooned to the order of up to $120 billion and are being maintained indefinitely.

On Tuesday, for example, the Fed created $90.8 billion out of thin air.  Of this, $58.6 billion was added to the overnight repo.  The remaining $32.2 billion was added to the 14-day repo.  Then, on Thursday, the Fed created another $74.2 billion out of thin air.  Of this, $44.15 billion was added to the overnight repo, and the remaining $30 billion was added to the 14-day repo.

Mere Coincidence?

What exactly triggered the September 16/17 repo rate spike is unclear.  Did a large bank or hedge fund not have sufficient high quality collateral, which then froze them out of the repo market?

One theory is that JP Morgan had a hand in it.  Here CCN shares the abstract thinking of DataDash founder Nicholas Merten:

“According to Merten, JP Morgan ‘predominantly caused’ the repo market surge in September.  The financial giant pulled out $130 billion from the overnight lending market.  The sudden drop in reserves drove the overnight lending rate to soar to 10 percent.

“At this point, the Fed had a choice.  They could have stay away from the repo market and watch interest rates skyrocket while stocks crash.  Or they could step in, supply liquidity and keep things humming.  We know how it panned out.

“JP Morgan wins twice in this situation.  First, they have the liquidity to initiate a large buyback scheme.  While pumping shares, they could dole out handsome dividends to attract more investors.  The result is a surge in stock price.

“Second, the bank [JP Morgan] forced the central bank [the Fed] to fund hedge funds and keep their over-leveraged positions open.  As long as these hedge funds have access to liquidity, the extended bull market will likely continue.  In other words, the Fed (through hedge funds) is helping drive up the price of JP Morgan (NYSE:JPM) shares.

“Since September, JPM’s stock price has gone from $107.32 to 136.84, a gain of over 27 percent.  That number is nearly twice of what the S&P 500 gained in the same time period.”

Was this mere coincidence?  Was this an elaborate trap?  We’ll let you decide.

Regardless, the Fed’s now trapped…and there’s no safe way out.  Here’s why…

The Impulses of Lunar Fed Policy Under Repo Madness

The Fed, through its repo madness program, has supplied financial markets – including big banks like JP Morgan – with mass liquidity.  But that’s not all.  The Fed’s also supplied financial markets with a highly tenuous assumption:

The Fed will never allow the lack of liquidity of a major debtor to become an insolvency crisis that contracts the money supply.

This assumption, without question, will be proven false at the worst possible time.

The repo market, as we understand it, is where big banks and hedge funds conduct countless interlocking transactions, totaling as much as $3 trillion in debt being financed each and every day.  However, the repo market’s massive size and complex web of lending agreements makes it inherently fragile.  Everything works just great…until suddenly something breaks…

All it takes is the failure of a big bank or hedge fund to meet its commitments and the whole complex web of agreements comes undone.  In short, a liquidity crisis could quickly contract credit with far reaching implications.  Namely, rapid deflation.

Thus, to counteract the prospect of a liquidity crisis and deflationary credit crisis the Fed must inflate the money supply.  But it can’t inflate too fast.  And it can’t inflate too slow. Like piloting a lunar module, the Fed must throttle and thrust the money supply just right.

For example, as noted above, on Thursday the Fed spread $74.2 billion between the overnight repo and the 14-day repo.  But get this…net liquidity declined.  Because of past operations expiring, outstanding short-term Fed liquidity injections fell by $10 billion.

How long will it take before the Fed makes a mistake, and repo rates shoot to the moon followed by a deflationary credit crisis?

More than likely, the Fed will error on the side of supplying excess liquidity.  But if the Fed overcompensates, consumer prices will quickly hyperinflate out of orbit.

Such are the impulses of lunar Fed policy under repo madness.

Sincerely,

MN Gordon
for Economic Prism

Return from The Impulses of Lunar Fed Policy Under Repo Madness to Economic Prism

This entry was posted in Inflation, MN Gordon and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to The Impulses of Lunar Fed Policy Under Repo Madness

  1. Pingback: The Impulses Of Lunar Fed Policy Under Repo Madness | Zero Hedge

  2. Pingback: The Impulses Of Lunar Fed Policy Under Repo Madness

  3. Pingback: The Impulses Of Lunar Fed Policy Under Repo Madness – ProTradingResearch

  4. Pingback: The Impulses of Lunar Fed Policy Under Repo Madness – Olduvai.ca

  5. Pingback: The Impulses Of Lunar Fed Policy Under Repo Madness – TradingCheatSheet

  6. Pingback: The Impulses Of Lunar Fed Policy Under Repo Madness – iftttwall

  7. Pingback: The Impulses Of Lunar Fed Policy Under Repo Madness - StockExchange.international

  8. Pingback: The Impulses Of Lunar Fed Policy Under Repo Madness | ValuBit

  9. Pingback: The Impulses Of Lunar Fed Policy Under Repo Madness – Investing Money Trends

  10. Pingback: The Impulses Of Lunar Fed Policy Under Repo Madness – plan B

  11. Pingback: The Impulses Of Lunar Fed Policy Under Repo Madness – World News Click

  12. Pingback: The Impulses Of Lunar Fed Policy Under Repo Madness | Real Patriot News

  13. Pingback: The Impulses Of Lunar Fed Policy Under Repo Madness | Newzsentinel

  14. Excellent overview Mr Gordon, thank you. But I would like you to consider that the Fed is not pumping enough liquidity into the market.

    There are several parameters that indicate this fact. Look at the velocity of money:
    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M2V and the M2 figures: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M2 It’s not nearly enough.

    My friend Gerry Brady in Australia and I have worked over several years during the construction of my book and we have concluded the following – have a read:
    https://boomfinanceandeconomics.wordpress.com/2020/01/18/boom-as-at-19th-january-2020/

    I would love to hear your views.

    • Hans says:

      Mr Underwood, there really is no such thing as velocity
      of money. Furthermore, your first link indicts what? Nothing,
      from what I could discern. The velocity of money is little more
      than your standard GNP.

      “Note that over the 17-year period of downward-trending “V” there were multiple economic booms and busts, not one of which was predicted by or reliably indicated by “money velocity”. However, every boom and every bust was led by a change in the rate of growth of True Money Supply (TMS).”

      https://tsi-blog.com/2015/06/theres-no-such-thing-as-money-velocity/

      “In BOOM’s “perfect economy”, all central banks would be wholly government owned. This would make them answerable to the people through the democratic process of oversight by elected representatives. Many central banks are currently privately owned, principally by their client banks and this model is fraught with long term risk and lack of objectivity.”

      The current climatic would be even worse than it is now, since the Central
      Bank Cartel is not only controlling the direction of interest rates but additionally scuttling the normal business cycle. The control of the FRS, by the pols, would subject it to relentless assaults by statists and cause additional harm to an already battered free enterprise system.

      Professor Underwood, I invite your comments or rebuttals but
      I suspect I will not hear from you.

      Be well,
      Hans

  15. Pingback: The Impulses of Lunar Fed Policy Under Repo Madness - Free World Economic Report

  16. Hans says:

    The report is that Repo Madness will continue
    through the end of April. An extension from January.

Leave a Reply to Peter Underwood Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.