The Cure is Worse than the Disease

Today we look back to the recent past with singleness of purpose.  Context and edification for the present economy is what we’re after.  We have questions…

How come the recovery has been so weak?  Why is it that, nearly seven years after the official end of the Great Recession, the economy’s still mired in a soft muddy quag?  Squinting, focusing, and refocusing, there’s one particular week that rises above all others.

On Saturday September 20, 2008, Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson delivered a draft of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to Congress for review.  If you recall, it had been another wild week.  On Monday, September 15, after 158 years of operation, Lehman Brothers vanished from the face of the earth…Dick Fuld, “The Gorilla,” be damned.

All week the sky relentlessly fell on financial markets.  Even money market funds were in full panic.  In fact, a record $169.03 billion of capital had vacated money market funds in the week ended September 17.

That same day, the Wall Street Journal’s headline was, “U.S. to Take Over AIG in $85 Billion Bailout.”  On top of that, the Primary Fund broke the buck – falling to $0.97 cents a share.  The SEC also went so far as to impose a 10 trading-day ban on short sales of 799 financial stocks.

The Free Market is Dead

Certainly, this week of bank bailouts, busted money markets, and extreme SEC intervention are still unsettling.  But looking back in retrospect, for context to the present, above all others, one brief statement captures the essence of it all both then and now.

“The free market for all intents and purposes is dead in America,” said Kentucky Senator Jim Bunning on September 19.  “The action proposed today by the Treasury Department will take away the free market and institute socialism in America.  The American taxpayer has been mislead throughout this economic crisis.  The government on all fronts has failed the American people miserably.”

Bunning’s remarks turned out to be both accurate and prescient.  For he uttered them prior to the insanity of quantitative easing.  If the free market wasn’t already dead with the rollout of TARP, in the post quantitative easing world it is a corpse.

Free markets, in particular the credit market, have been destroyed.  The rewards of accumulating capital through saving no longer exist.  Unfortunately, a lifetime of saving will no longer support a golden years of living off the interest.  These days a lifetime of saving only buys you a cup of coffee.

At the same time, asset prices have been so distorted it’s near impossible to tell what’s an investment and what’s a speculation.  For example, ExxonMobile recently lost its Triple A credit rating, a grade it had maintained since 1930.  Like many other corporations, broken credit markets had enticed them into financial engineering.

The Cure is Worse than the Disease

In particular, the Fed’s monetary policies have made funding share buybacks and dividend payments with borrowed money an attractive management tactic.  In the face of stalling business prospects, these short-term gimmicks can make business operation appear healthy.  But surely even someone with a Masters in Finance can recognize this is merely transferring money from bond holders to shareholders.

Naturally, executives love borrowing money to buyback shares…especially those receiving handsome compensation in the form of stock options.  For it lines their pockets and gives a short boost to earnings per share.  But what it doesn’t do is create new value.

In ExxonMobile’s case, without the proper price signals provided by a free functioning credit market, the company was compelled to shoot themselves in the foot.  When oil prices were high, also an effect of a broken credit market, executives drained off the cash reserves they’d need to weather the oil price decline.  Strength garnered through a century of sound business practices evaporated.

Up and down the DOW the story repeats.  In 1980, over 60 U.S. companies had a Triple A credit rating.  Now, just two companies – Johnson & Johnson and Microsoft – remain.

Such is the fate of a planned economy, with fixed credit markets, and an elastic currency.  Slow growth, and soon no growth, coupled with rising corporate debt and falling operating cash flow is the Frankenstein economy Ben Bernanke and Hank Paulson gifted us.  The net result: the cure is worse than the disease.


MN Gordon
for Economic Prism

Return from The Cure is Worse than the Disease to Economic Prism

This entry was posted in MN Gordon, Politics and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to The Cure is Worse than the Disease

  1. Pingback: The Free Market Is Dead——Victim Of A Cure Worse Than The Disease | David Stockman's Contra Corner

  2. Pingback: The Cure Is Worse Than The Disease | DailyDeceit

  3. Pingback: The Cure Is Worse Than The Disease | Political American

  4. Pingback: The Cure Is Worse Than The Disease | StrikeEngine

  5. Leon Louw says:

    Everyone should learn a repeatedly use the term for cures being worse than diseases because the phenomenon is the norm; it characterises interventionism (dirigisme).

    The term is “iatrogenic” (

    The process is “iatrogenisis” (

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.