Paying the Price for Krugman’s Terrible Mistake

Clear economic thinking and lucid communication via the written word tumbled out of fashion nearly 100 years ago.  The fall from grace was triggered by the 1936 publication of John Maynard Keynes’ The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.

Not only is the book rigorously indecipherable.  It also has the ill-effect of making those who read it dumber.  Unfortunately, Keynes’ drivel became the standard for foolish economic thinking, which still infects economic discourse to this day.

Many politicians and establishment economists remain enamored with Keynes’ gibberish.  They love what it offers.  In short, it provides academic rationale for governments to do what they love to do most – borrow money and spend it on ridiculous programs.

For example, Keynes advocated filling bottles with money and burying them in coalmines for people to dig up as a way to end unemployment.  According to Keynes, this would provide jobs and money for the unemployed.  Somehow, these public works egg hunts would create an economic boom and make everyone rich.

Over the years this reasoning has inspired countless government stunts to save the economy from itself.  The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and the American Rescue Plan of 2021 are two mega Keynesian inspired spending bills passed this century.  The U.S. will never be able to overcome the consequences of these asinine programs.

Just over a decade ago, Keynes devotee, Paul Krugman, took the logic of Keynesian economics and ran with it to the outer limits of deep space.  In the process, he lost his mind.

Following his righteous departure from planet earth, Krugman went on cable television and explained that the proper way to propel an economic growth chart up and to the right is to borrow massive amounts of money and spend it preparing for an alien invasion.

Only a Nobel Prize winning economist could come up with such nonsense.

A Very Bad Call

Paul Krugman, of course, is a complete madcap.  His days contemplating apparent aggregate demand insufficiencies and perceived supply gluts turned his brain to mush.  His time staring at graphs while pondering possible government policies to make the graphs show what he wants transformed him into a moron.

Krugman has unwittingly experienced a higher learning glut from within the confines of Princeton University.  In the pursuit of theory, he forgot one critically fundamental thing…how to think.

Yet occasionally, when buckets full of ice cold reality are repeatedly thrown in his face, Krugman has a brief moment of clarity.  Consumer price inflation raging at an annual rate of 9.1 percent appears to delivered that moment.

On July 21, 2022, Krugman penned on op-ed in The New York Times titled: “I Was Wrong About Inflation.”  In the article, Krugman focuses on the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, which was passed in March of 2021 to counteract the economic consequences of government ordered coronavirus lockdowns.

In the op-ed, Krugman mentioned that some economists warned it would lead to rising inflation.  But that he, like many other Keynesian economists, was “fairly relaxed” about the stimulus package.  “As it turned out, of course, that was a very bad call,” admitted Krugman.

The experience over the last 18 months has shown the Keynesian nirvana of countercyclical stimulus spending to be absolute bosh.  Somehow, with all his liquidity trap graphs, Krugman couldn’t see what was so clearly obvious…

That printing trillions of dollars and directly injecting them into the economy via stimmy checks, PPP, and lavish unemployment checks would cause raging consumer price inflation.

Broken Models

Did Krugman think this would be another instance of pushing on a string, like the 2008 bailout of the big banks via AIG?  Did he think the fake money would largely remain within the financial sector like TARP funds did, and only slowly drip out into the real economy?

Maybe so.  Here’s Krugman’s rationale for his “very bad call.”

“Historical experience wouldn’t have led us to expect this much inflation from overheating.  So something was wrong with my model of inflation — again, a model shared by many others, including those who were right to worry in early 2021.

“In any case, the whole experience has been a lesson in humility…But in retrospect I should have realized that, in the face of the new world created by Covid-19, that kind of extrapolation wasn’t a safe bet.”

Apparently, Krugman’s model of inflation is a great big dud.  It failed to forecast the greatest consumer price inflation blowout in over 40 years.  If it couldn’t do that, then what good is it?

To be clear, a model is only as good as its inputs.  The Keynesian approach of using aggregate data to identify apparent demand insufficiencies and perceived supply gluts is flawed.  Unemployment.  Gross domestic product.  Price inflation.  These data points are all fabricated up and fudged out to the government number crunchers liking.

For each headline number there are a list of footnotes and qualifiers.  Hedonic price adjustments.  Price deflators.  Seasonal adjustments.  Discouraged worker disappearances.  These subjective adjustments greatly affect the results.  So what good are they?

And why’s The New York Times still giving Krugman a platform?

Paying the Price for Krugman’s Terrible Mistake

Now, where the rubber meets the road, failed Keynesian policies coupled with monetary madness have positioned the U.S. economy and financial system in an extraordinarily unfavorable place.  Where consumer price inflation is raging while the economy is contracting.

Just yesterday (Thursday), second quarter GDP data was released by the Commerce Department.  Between April and June the economy contracted at an annual rate of 0.9 percent.  This is on the heels of a first quarter GDP contraction of 1.6 percent.

Two consecutive quarters of contracting GDP meets the technical definition of a recession.  So, with shrinkage occurring in both Q1 and Q2, the U.S. economy is without a doubt in a recession.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen may say, “this is not an economy that’s in recession.”  But the facts – the government’s own fudged data – say otherwise.

Yet here’s where things really get interesting…

Because professional economists like Krugman and Yellen were wrong about inflation, and the Federal Reserve let it get away, the Fed is having to hike the federal funds rate in the face of a contracting economy.  This week the Fed hiked the federal funds rate another 75 basis points to bring it to a range of 2.25 to 2.50 percent.

How much higher can the Fed go before something breaks?

We’ll find out soon.  Moreover, we expect a mega disaster to arrive before inflation subsides.  At this point, the Fed will have to trigger a massive, 1930s-style depression to stop inflation in its tracks.

Here’s the point: Krugman was wrong.  He admitted it.  And we all get to pay the price for his terrible mistake.

[Editor’s note: Don’t let the mistakes of Krugman and other professional economists destroy everything you’ve worked so hard for.  This is a dangerous time.  For this reason, I’ve dedicated the past 6-months to researching and identifying simple, practical steps everyday Americans can take to protect their wealth and financial privacy.  The findings of my work are documented in the Financial First Aid Kit.  If you’d like to find out more about this important and unique publication, and how to acquire a copy, stop by here today!]


MN Gordon
for Economic Prism

Return from Paying the Price for Krugman’s Terrible Mistake to Economic Prism

This entry was posted in Inflation, MN Gordon and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to Paying the Price for Krugman’s Terrible Mistake

  1. Andy T says:

    I agree. You failed to mention two other forms of stimulus.

    First and foremost, there continue to be eviction moratoriums in major cities. Rent which would otherwise go to landlords is retained and spent by scofflaw tenants. The accumulated rent debt is unrecoverable. In LA, for example the moratorium goes until fall 2023 and may be extended.

    Second, student debt repayment remains suspended. Thus more liquidity for consumption.

    Probably more examples too.

  2. Pingback: Paying The Price For Krugman’s Terrible Mistake – iftttwall

  3. Pingback: Paying The Price For Krugman's Terrible Mistake | New Covenant Network News

  4. Pingback: Paying The Price For Krugman's Terrible Mistake –

  5. Pingback: Paying The Price For Krugman’s Terrible Mistake – TAKIN' IT BACK

  6. Pingback: Paying The Price For Krugman’s Terrible Mistake – Understanding Deep Politics

  7. Pingback: Paying The Price For Krugman’s Terrible Mistake : by Tyler Durden – Dawson County Journal

  8. Pingback: Paying The Price For Krugman’s Terrible Mistake

  9. Pingback: Paying The Price For Krugman's Terrible Mistake - Investing Book Deals

  10. Pingback: Paying The Price For Krugman’s Terrible Mistake – Sovereign Vision

  11. Pingback: Paying The Price For Krugman’s Terrible Mistake – Mist Vista

  12. Pingback: Paying The Price For Krugman’s Terrible Mistake –

  13. Pingback: TheRedWave News

  14. Pingback: Paying The Price For Krugman’s Terrible Mistake – Truth Vetter

  15. Pingback: Paying The Price For Krugman's Terrible Mistake | ZeroHedge

  16. Pingback: Paying The Price For Krugman's Terrible Mistake -

  17. Pingback: Educational Financial Newsletter – Educational Financial Newsletter

  18. HockeyGuy says:

    Our gormless elite class absolutely LOVE to pontificate and “model” this and that – Inflation rates, war casualties, virus hospitalizations, future global temperature increases – all with their own prejudices and conclusions already baked into the garbage algorithms. Yet with all their fancy degrees and mandatory diversity training, they can’t ever seem to figure out why the models rarely match reality.

  19. Pingback: Skip to content – Educational Financial Newsletter

  20. Pingback: Black Coffee: Squeezing Blood from Turnips - Len Penzo dot Com

  21. Pingback: Black Coffee: Squeezing Blood from Turnips –

  22. Curmudgeon says:

    You misrepresent Keynes. The injection of money into the system during bad times was not to be “borrowed”, it was to be taken from reserves set aside in good times. Your analogy of borrowing is like saying you can’t meet this month’s expenses with your chequing account, so you are “borrowing” from your savings account, which means not only do you have to repay your savings account, you have to pay the interest you would have earned on that “borrowed” money.
    Cliff Douglas, with his Social Credit model before Keynes, demonstrated that interest on debt was the cause of government problems, and that it was the law of diminishing returns. When the Province of Alberta government implemented as much of Douglas’ Social Credit in the depths of the depression after inheriting a massive debt – caused by your economic model – the province was debt free with surplusses before WWII.
    The neighbouring Province of Saskatchewan implemented “socialist” economics at the same time, under the same circumstances, and achieved the same result. Smart ass economists assume their economic model fits everywhere, all the time. It doesn’t. What works in one place does not necessarily work in another, particularly in large countries with different population densities and massively different climate and geographic influences.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.